<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><br><div><div>On Apr 6, 2011, at 12:41 PM, ARIN wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div>The minutes from the ARIN Advisory Council's March 17 meeting have<br>been published:<br><br><a href="https://www.arin.net/about_us/ac/ac2011_0317.html">https://www.arin.net/about_us/ac/ac2011_0317.html</a><br><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#006312"><br></font></div></blockquote></div><div><br></div><div>In the minutes of the 17-Mar AC meeting, as published, there is a comment by John Curran noted under the discussion of ARIN-Prop-133:</div><div><br></div><div>"JC stated that in proposals 133 and 134, there is a question of the concept of an independent registry. He explained that ARIN started staff and legal review on these early, because we felt it was necessary. If these proposals are on the AC’s docket, JC stated that he was arranging to meet with the author for a staff and legal review discussion of these proposals."</div><div><br></div><div>Unfortunately, John did not attend our scheduled meeting, and I have not seen the staff and legal review. The only context I have, beyond the AC meeting minutes, is the staff's "clarity and understanding" questions - it would be useful to see their conclusions, as well. Can ARIN provide the staff assessment and legal review, either directly to me or to the PPML? It is difficult to evaluate John's comments, and determine how much effort to put into these proposals going forward, without seeing this material.</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks,</div><div>-Benson</div><div><br></div></body></html>