<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 12 (filtered medium)"><title>Re: [arin-ppml] Application requests for IPv6?</title><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>Leslie,<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>What is the percentage of ISPs that were denied a reasonable sized block vs. being forced into a /32 because that is the fad? I define ‘reasonable’ in this context as - existing customer base @ something larger than a /64 per customer -. <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>The point is I am still hearing people say they can’t deploy more than a /64 to their customers because that won’t fit in the /32 they got from ARIN. I am also hearing that when orgs walk in with documentation showing multiple downstream ISPs they are not getting sufficient space to assign each of those ISPs even a /32, let alone what it would take to meet the above definition of reasonable. Essentially the question becomes ‘why doesn’t ARIN have any service provider IPv6 allocations of order /20?’ The implication is an overly strict interpretation of the policy...<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>Tony<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div style='border:none;border-left:solid blue 1.5pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 4.0pt'><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>From:</span></b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'> arin-ppml-bounces@arin.net [mailto:arin-ppml-bounces@arin.net] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Leslie Nobile<br><b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, February 09, 2011 9:52 AM<br><b>To:</b> Martin Hannigan; arin-ppml@arin.net<br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [arin-ppml] Application requests for IPv6?<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>Hi Marty-<br><br>In response to your recent inquiry about IPv6 requests to ARIN, staff has produced the following data. <br><br><b>Total IPv6 Requests January 2009 through January 2011:<br></b><br>ISP requests received – 748 <br>ISP requests approved - 712 or 96%<br><br>Generally speaking, for ISPs, there are almost no denials for IPv6 address requests. Anything not approved was likely an end-user who put in an ISP request and needed to resubmit as an end-user. In fact, during this past year, there have been no denials to ISPs/LIRs under the IPv6 allocation policy which seems to indicate that the current policy has been very effective.<br><br>End-user requests received - 464 <br>End-user requests approved – 403 or 87%<br><br>Almost all of the denied end-user requests were to small single-homed networks who were unable to meet any one of the policy criteria: they either (1) weren’t using enough IPv4 address space to qualify under current IPv4 policy, (2) had no legacy space, or (3) didn’t qualify as a community network. <br><br>I hope this information helps!<br><br>Regards,<br>Leslie<br><br><br>Leslie Nobile,<br>Director, Registration Services<br>American Registry for Internet Numbers<br><br><br>On 2/6/11 6:48 PM, "Martin Hannigan" <<a href="hannigan@gmail.com">hannigan@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><br><span style='color:blue'>> Staff et. Al,<br>> <br>> Can we get a recap of activity around resource requests for IPv6 and a<br>> characterization of refusals, if any? If there are none, it would be<br>> interesting to hear a general conclusion as to why. I'm interested to<br>> see if there are any holes here considering all of the work that has<br>> been done to ease access to v6 for transition.<br>> <br>> Best, and go Steelers!<br>> <br>> -M<<br>> _______________________________________________<br>> PPML<br>> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to<br>> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (<a href="ARIN-PPML@arin.net">ARIN-PPML@arin.net</a>).<br>> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:<br>> <a href="http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml">http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml</a><br>> Please contact <a href="info@arin.net">info@arin.net</a> if you experience any issues.</span></span><o:p></o:p></p></div></div></body></html>