<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><br><div><div>On Dec 10, 2010, at 9:24 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><br><div><div>On Dec 10, 2010, at 8:10 AM, Hannigan, Martin wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div><br><br><br>On 12/10/10 10:51 AM, "Owen DeLong" <<a href="mailto:owen@delong.com">owen@delong.com</a>> wrote:<br><br><br>[ snip ]<br><br><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">First, no, this activity is quite different from 8.3 and it is the<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">modification to<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">8.3 that I am primarily objecting to.<br></blockquote><br>How is this in opposition to good stewardship? To be clear, NRPM 8.3 is not<br>being modified. The overshadowing language of NRPM 4.2.4.4 is being<br>modified. In fact, it may be better to have no language and let the staff<br>interpret the intent of the community with respect to the transfer policy in<br>a similar to fashion as the globally coordinated transfer proposal may be<br>interpreted.<br><br></div></blockquote>The overshadowing language in 4.2.4.4 had strong community consensus</div><div>and is, I believe the intent of the community. Removing it is not, in my</div><div>opinion beneficial.</div><div><br></div><div>If you reduce your proposal to simply <i>removing the</i> adding this:</div><div><br></div></div></blockquote>Sorry... That should have read:</div><div><br></div><div>If you reduce your proposal to simply adding this:</div><div><br><blockquote type="cite"><div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px; "> Any pending request submitted prior to that moment will continue to be eligible for a twelve month supply of addresses as long as need is established within thirty days of that moment.</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px; "><br></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px; ">to 4.2.4.4, yes, I could support that.</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px; "><br></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px; ">Owen</span></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" face="sans-serif" size="3"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px;"><br></span></font></div></div>_______________________________________________<br>PPML<br>You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to<br>the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (<a href="mailto:ARIN-PPML@arin.net">ARIN-PPML@arin.net</a>).<br>Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:<br><a href="http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml">http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml</a><br>Please contact info@arin.net if you experience any issues.</blockquote></div><br></body></html>