<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 6.5.7654.12">
<TITLE>RE: [arin-ppml] Sensible IP Allocations Revision 0.9</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<!-- Converted from text/plain format -->
<P><FONT SIZE=2>I think the only utility is to roughly equate the two from the perspective of those outside our region reading ARIN policy.<BR>
bd<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
-----Original Message-----<BR>
From: arin-ppml-bounces@arin.net on behalf of Bill Woodcock<BR>
Sent: Wed 12/1/2010 4:54 PM<BR>
To: Owen DeLong<BR>
Cc: ppml@arin.net PPML<BR>
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Sensible IP Allocations Revision 0.9<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
On Dec 1, 2010, at 2:44 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:<BR>
<BR>
> Here is the revised text of proposal 121. Changes in this version:<BR>
><BR>
> 1. Wordsmithing<BR>
> 2. Improved definition of ISP/LIR<BR>
<BR>
Out of curiousity, why use the acronym "LIR" at all? It doesn't have any meaning in our region.<BR>
<BR>
-Bill<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
</FONT>
</P>
</BODY>
</HTML>