<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>Re: [arin-ppml] NRPM 2010.1 – New Policies Implemented</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<FONT FACE="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:11pt'><BR>
On 1/13/10 3:44 PM, "Ted Mittelstaedt" <<a href="tedm@ipinc.net">tedm@ipinc.net</a>> wrote:<BR>
<BR>
</SPAN></FONT><BLOCKQUOTE><FONT FACE="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:11pt'><a href="marty@akamai.com">marty@akamai.com</a> wrote:<BR>
><BR>
><BR>
> On 1/13/10 3:06 PM, "Member Services" <<a href="info@arin.net">info@arin.net</a>> wrote:<BR>
><BR>
>> On 18 December 2009 the ARIN Board of Trustees, based on the<BR>
>> recommendation of the Advisory Council and noting that the Policy<BR>
>> Development Process had been followed, adopted the following number<BR>
>> resource policies:<BR>
>><BR>
><BR>
> [ snip ]<BR>
><BR>
>> 2009-3 (Global Proposal): Allocation of IPv4 Blocks to Regional<BR>
>> Internet Registries<BR>
><BR>
> [ clip ]<BR>
><BR>
>> 2009-6 (Global Proposal): Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA)<BR>
>> Policy for Allocation of ASN Blocks (ASNs) to Regional Internet Registries<BR>
>><BR>
><BR>
> [ clip ]<BR>
><BR>
>> The two global proposals, 2009-3 and 2009-6, await the conclusion of the<BR>
>> Global Policy Development Process.<BR>
><BR>
><BR>
> This is ambiguous. Could you please clarify?<BR>
><BR>
> Since both of these globally submitted policies have been accepted by the<BR>
> AC, ratified by the BoT and have completed the ARIN PDP cycle they _are_<BR>
> both ARIN region policies regardless of the problem with at least 2009-6<BR>
> being significantly contextually different than other regions versions. That<BR>
> problem is not relevant so I would think that these policies are awaiting<BR>
> nothing that is relevant to them per se.<BR>
><BR>
> Correct?<BR>
><BR>
><BR>
> Best,<BR>
><BR>
> Martin<BR>
><BR>
><BR>
><BR>
<BR>
How exactly is IANA held to ARIN's policies? ARIN could decide that<BR>
IANA give all it's remaining IPv4 to ARIN, is IANA obligated to pay<BR>
attention to that? Seems to me your not going to get IANA to do<BR>
jack until any policy that affects it completes the GDP.<BR>
<BR>
Ted<BR>
<BR>
</SPAN></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE><FONT FACE="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:11pt'>Ted,<BR>
<BR>
Good question. Without a global policy, they aren’t. If you mean to ask how that relationship is actually governed, you can see the documents that codify the relationship and the global PDP by browsing here: <a href="http://www.nro.net/">http://www.nro.net/</a><BR>
<BR>
Best,<BR>
<BR>
-M<<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
-- <BR>
Martin Hannigan <a href="http://www.akamai.com">http://www.akamai.com</a><BR>
Akamai Technologies, Inc. <a href="marty@akamai.com">marty@akamai.com</a><BR>
Cambridge, MA USA cell: +16178216079<BR>
ofc: +16174442535<BR>
</SPAN></FONT>
</BODY>
</HTML>