<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 6.5.7654.12">
<TITLE>RE: [arin-ppml] AC abandonment of Policy Proposal 92 Alternate IPv6Allocation</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<!-- Converted from text/plain format -->
<P><FONT SIZE=2>Joe,<BR>
<BR>
According to my reading of the PDP....<BR>
<BR>
Anyone may initiate a petition to bring a proposal to discussion as long as the petition is begun within 5 days of the announced action by the AC...which was the 23rd, I believe.<BR>
<BR>
Once a petition is brought forth, the petitioners have 5 days to generate 10 petition supporters from 10 different organizations to be successful.<BR>
<BR>
The full PDP including the petition process is to be found at.... <A HREF="https://www.arin.net/policy/pdp.html">https://www.arin.net/policy/pdp.html</A><BR>
<BR>
Bill Darte<BR>
ARIN Advisory Council<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
-----Original Message-----<BR>
From: arin-ppml-bounces@arin.net on behalf of Joe Maimon<BR>
Sent: Thu 6/25/2009 8:08 PM<BR>
To: ppml@arin.net<BR>
Subject: [arin-ppml] AC abandonment of Policy Proposal 92 Alternate IPv6Allocation<BR>
<BR>
"The AC believes that Policy Proposal<BR>
#92 has some merit in concept, but does not believe that the problem<BR>
addressed is immediate nor of sufficient scope currently. Furthermore,<BR>
the benefits presumed may be achieved in ways other than using the<BR>
discrete pools for address allocation. We hope that the author continues<BR>
to discuss this issue with the AC and community."<BR>
<BR>
I believe there are timeliness issues involved, especially as it<BR>
pertains to routing policy, as well as an interest in dispelling<BR>
uncertainty with regards to ipv6 rollout which may be a factor in<BR>
delaying migration.<BR>
<BR>
I would suggest a more appropriate action would be to delay working on<BR>
the proposal until it has had more time to mature in our minds,<BR>
something like what happened with policy proposal 95, customer<BR>
confidentiality.<BR>
<BR>
Is it considered polite to defer to a policy proposal's author for a<BR>
discussion petition? Ia a petition under consideration?<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
_______________________________________________<BR>
PPML<BR>
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to<BR>
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net).<BR>
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:<BR>
<A HREF="http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml">http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml</A><BR>
Please contact info@arin.net if you experience any issues.<BR>
<BR>
</FONT>
</P>
</BODY>
</HTML>