<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Michael Loftis wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:87390B2DDDE148072A5ACF1B@ZOP-MACTEL.local"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
--On March 27, 2009 1:32:49 PM -0700 Ted Mittelstaedt <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:tedm@ipinc.net"><tedm@ipinc.net></a>
wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">check out the dd-wrt firmware, it can be loaded on many of the small
consumer devices and it's rock solid. IPv6 support was in the prior
release of it, was broken in the current release, and is fixed in
the beta releases.
Ted
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
Unsupported third party firmware is not an option. We're talking about
places like C&W, RoadRunner, Rogers, Etc. Not you and me.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
I agree with the idea earlier in this thread that you should be talking
to your vendors. I've been successful in pushing one of my vendors into
an IPv6 commitment. If you make cogent arguments about what your needs
are, and reinforce what your time frame is, your vendors may start to
budge in the right direction.<br>
<br>
I would also note that IPv6 support *is* available in many broadcom
based CPE devices - including ZyXEL, Comtrend, Zhone and Clear Access -
but is not compiled by default. I've had an enlightening look through
some available releases of the broadcom firmware source:<br>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://blog.rot13.org/2007/10/bcm963xx_git_repository.html">http://blog.rot13.org/2007/10/bcm963xx_git_repository.html</a><br>
<br>
- Dan<br>
</body>
</html>