<html><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><div><div>On Sep 10, 2008, at 3:05 PM, Eric Westbrook wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr">On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 10:06 AM, Stephen Sprunk <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:stephen@sprunk.org">stephen@sprunk.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> My understanding of LRSA §10(b) ("ARIN will take no action to reduce the services provided for Included Number Resources that are not currently being utilized by the Legacy Applicant.") covered that. That is certainly the intent, though I agree it could be more clearly stated.</blockquote> <div>...<br>Ironic indeed that LRSA resources that are actually utilized do not enjoy the benefits of §10(b), while those that aren't utilized enjoy them fully!<br><br>Surely this is a mistake?</div></div></div></blockquote><br></div><div>The concept of ARIN reducing services for number resources that</div><div>are actually being used by a legacy holder is sufficiently alien that </div><div>it likely just didn't occur to those involved in drafting the LRSA...</div><div><br></div><div>/John</div><div>(personal guess only)</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div></body></html>