<HTML dir=ltr><HEAD><TITLE>Re: [arin-ppml] Q1 - ARIN address transfer policy: why the trigger date?</TITLE>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=unicode">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.3354" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV id=idOWAReplyText44578 dir=ltr>
<DIV dir=ltr><FONT face=Arial color=#000000 size=2>As soon as the policy passes. No time to game the system </FONT></DIV></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr><BR>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
<FONT face=Tahoma size=2><B>From:</B> Scott Leibrand [mailto:sleibrand@internap.com]<BR><B>Sent:</B> Fri 6/20/2008 10:35 AM<BR><B>To:</B> Milton L Mueller<BR><B>Cc:</B> PPML ppml<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re: [arin-ppml] Q1 - ARIN address transfer policy: why the trigger date?<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV>
<P><FONT size=2>Milton L Mueller wrote:<BR>> And my simple observation is that if it<BR>> makes sense to do that after IANA pool depletion, it makes sense to do<BR>> it beforehand.<BR><BR>For what it's worth, the Denver meeting seemed to agree with you. The<BR>meeting transcript reads:<BR><BR>"On the assumption that ARIN continues work on the policy proposal and<BR>maintains a need-based qualification of recipients, all those in favor<BR>of an effective date sooner than the IANA IPv4 free pool depletion,<BR>raise your hand. ... On the matter of an earlier effective date than the<BR>IPv4 depletion date, in favor, 35; opposed, 13. This information will be<BR>provided to the AC for their consideration."<BR><BR>So, perhaps the question should be: what would be a better "earlier<BR>effective date"?<BR><BR>-Scott<BR></FONT></P></DIV></BODY></HTML>