<!doctype html public "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<html><head><style type="text/css"><!--
blockquote, dl, ul, ol, li { padding-top: 0 ; padding-bottom: 0 }
--></style><title>nro global policy was Re: [ppml] 2007-12 - Staff
Assessmen</title></head><body>
<div>At 14:22 -0400 4/13/07, Member Services wrote:</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>>
http://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2007_12.html<br>
></div>
<div><br></div>
<div>>
3.<x-tab> </x-tab>Author did
not indicate placement. Could be put in as new<br>
>section 4.9 of the NRPM Section 4.9. Also, that section would need
a</div>
<div>>heading, perhaps, "Availability of IPv4 Address
Space".</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>The staff comment is valid and I'm not questioning that.
But here is the beginning of the global policy process instruction on
the NRO website:</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>#Any individual may submit a global proposal. Each RIR community
must ratify an identical version</div>
<div>#of the proposed policy.</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>How "identical?" If the policies have to be
forced into the NRPM in ARIN and whatever the equivalent is in another
region, can any policy ever meet the requirement above?</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>Sorry for an idle though here - this isn't a comment on the
policy but is related to this being targeted as a global policy.</div>
<x-sigsep><pre>--
</pre></x-sigsep>
<div
>-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=<span
></span>-=-=-=-<br>
Edward
Lewis <span
></span
> <span
></span
> <span
></span
> <span
></span> +1-571-434-5468<br>
NeuStar</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>Sarcasm doesn't scale.</div>
</body>
</html>