[arin-ppml] Revised - Draft Policy ARIN-2025-7: Make Policy in 6.5.8.2 Match the Examples

[Jones, Brian]

I support this Draft policy as written. I made the suggestion concerning assignment to allocation change, thank you for incorporating it into this revision.

_
Brian Jones
Virginia Tech

On May 20, 2026, at 13:08, ARIN <info at arin.net> wrote:

The following Draft Policy has been revised:

*Draft Policy ARIN-2025-7: Make Policy in 6.5.8.2 Match the Examples

Revised text is below and can be found at:

https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/drafts/2025_7/

The Advisory Council shepherds have included the following comment:

"Based on community feedback, the policy structure was reworked to state that a single-site organization receives a /48, and then the 75% formula applies to multi-site organizations, rather than framing the /48 as an exception. In addition, we received comments stating the “assignment” term is no longer used and it should be updated to “allocation” to align with current procedures as they no longer reference assignments. This has been updated in the entire section."

You are encouraged to discuss all Draft Policies on PPML. The AC will evaluate the discussion to assess the conformance of this Draft Policy with ARIN's Principles of Internet number resource policy as stated in the Policy Development Process (PDP). Specifically, these principles are:

* Enabling Fair and Impartial Number Resource Administration
* Technically Sound
* Supported by the Community

The PDP can be found at:

https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/pdp/

Draft Policies and Proposals under discussion can be found at:

https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/drafts/


Regards,

Eddie Diego
Policy Analyst
American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)



Draft Policy 2025-7: Make Policy in 6.5.8.2 Match the Examples

Problem Statement:

6.5.8.2 states “An organization qualifies for an assignment on the next larger nibble boundary when their sites exceed 75% of the /48s available in a prefix.“and then follows with “For example: More than 1 but less than or equal to 12 sites justified, receives a /44 assignment;“implying that a single site should only receive a /48. However, 1 /48 exceeds 75% of the /48s available in a /48 (1), so per the rule an organization with a single site should receive a /44, which differs from the example.

Policy Statement:

Current Text:

6.5.8.2. Initial Assignment Size

Organizations that meet at least one of the initial assignment criteria above are eligible to receive an initial assignment of /48. Requests for larger initial assignments, reasonably justified with supporting documentation, will be evaluated based on the number of sites in an organization’s network and the number of subnets needed to support any extra-large sites defined below.

The initial assignment size will be determined by the number of sites justified below. An organization qualifies for an assignment on the next larger nibble boundary when their sites exceed 75% of the /48s available in a prefix. For example:

More than 1 but less than or equal to 12 sites justified, receives a /44 assignment;

More than 12 but less than or equal to 192 sites justified, receives a /40 assignment;

More than 192 but less than or equal to 3,072 sites justified, receives a /36 assignment;

More than 3,072 but less than or equal to 49,152 sites justified, receives a /32 assignment; etc…


Proposed Text:

6.5.8.2. Initial Allocation Size

Organizations that meet at least one of the initial allocation criteria above are eligible to receive an initial allocation of /48. Larger initial allocation sizes will be determined by the number of sites justified below; an organization will qualify for an allocation on the next larger nibble boundary when their sites exceed 75% of the /48s available in a prefix. For example:

* 2 to 12 sites justified will receive a /44 allocation;
* 13 to 192 sites justified will receive a /40 allocation;
* 193 to 3,072 sites justified will receive a /36 allocation;
* 3,073 to 49,152 sites justified will receive a /32 allocation, etc.

Timetable for Implementation: Immediate.

Comments:

Based on community feedback, the policy structure was reworked to state that a single-site organization receives a /48, and then the 75% formula applies to multi-site organizations, rather than framing the /48 as an exception. In addition, we received comments stating the “assignment” term is no longer used and it should be updated to “allocation” to align with current procedures as they no longer reference assignments. This has been updated in the entire section.


_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net<mailto:ARIN-PPML at arin.net>).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact info at arin.net<mailto:info at arin.net> if you experience any issues.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20260520/2aa4cee6/attachment-0001.htm>