[arin-ppml] Addressing for other planets
Alejandro Acosta
alejandroacostaalamo at gmail.com
Fri Feb 20 10:40:07 EST 2026
Hello Daryll, inline:
On 20/2/26 10:42 AM, Daryll Swer wrote:
> I agree with Alejandro's suggested model; this keeps it simple at the
> allocation level from IANA and simple for aggregating at RIR
Thanks!
> (or whoever is the authority) and simple for celestial-body-type
> segmentation: /3 for planet-like+moons and /3 for non-planet
> (asteroids or a small rock large enough for human operations such as
> 1-month resource mining and then auto-remove assignment as soon as
> human presence is gone, etc.) – perhaps that old standard "Mobile
> IPv6", which was never really used in real operations, might also come
> into play for space networking, enabling the auto-mobility of subnets
> from one asteroid/rock to another as human operations move that way.
>
> The contention point then becomes:
> What is the prefix length per planet? /10? /11? /16? It has to be
> large enough for future scaling on the planet but small enough not to
> cause exhaustion.
Maybe it's time to put together a sort of WG for creating such an
important IP address plan
> Likewise, prefix length or aggregation for non-planet-type bodies.
> Perhaps someone can run calculations based on real numbers of
> celestial bodies to determine the optimal prefix length allocation and
> sizing for minimised wastage, without introducing IPv4 psychosis into
> space.
That's a good one.
> Also perhaps it's wise to assume RFC9663 may become widely used for
> space networking endpoints in the future.
Anything is possible
Count me in—happy to help with this topic
Alejandro,
> This would greatly impact subnet modelling.
>
> I'd think it's unlikely other planets will have 8.3 billion humans
> anytime soon, and by the time it happens, we'll probably have moved
> beyond 128 bits.
>
> *--*
> Best Regards
> Daryll Swer
> Website: daryllswer.com
> <https://l.shortlink.es/l/491acc4f24e6ad057c5284ee3da28e8f464790a0?u=2153471>
>
>
> On Fri, 20 Feb 2026 at 19:52, Alejandro Acosta
> <alejandroacostaalamo at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> For me, it makes a lot of sense. However, I’d add one more layer:
> I would suggest a separate `/3` subnet just for planets
> (unfortunately other planets than earth) and another `/3` for
> other objects (like asteroids or Pluto, which isn’t actually a
> planet). Addresses for natural satellites would fall within the
> address space of their respective planets.”
>
> Alejandro,
>
>
> On 20/2/26 9:54 AM, Daryll Swer via ARIN-PPML wrote:
>> If we create GUA aggregates per planet (like we did on Earth with
>> 2000::/3), should we also create /10s per planet, excluding
>> Earth? I'm curious to hear what people think we should do for
>> prefix length allocation to large bodies (planets) and possibly
>> moons as well.
>>
>> I don't think we should use 2000::/3 for anything outside Earth's
>> immediate orbit, maybe the Moon at most. I think a *different* /3
>> from IANA should be used for space networking. This would allow
>> clean aggregation per large body (planet or equivalent) and clean
>> segmentations across RIRs (if we decide RIRs have allocation
>> authority for space networking).
>>
>> *--*
>> Best Regards
>> Daryll Swer
>> Website: daryllswer.com
>> <https://l.shortlink.es/l/19174986ed03cd89016996337141dbbdd6d81d1f?u=2153471>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 20 Feb 2026 at 02:32, Tony Li <tony.li at tony.li> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> As part of the IETF TIPTOP working group, we are working
>> towards enabling the Internet in outer space. We would like
>> to direct your attention to a couple of recent Internet
>> drafts that may be of interest:
>>
>> An Architecture for IP in Deep Space
>> <https://l.shortlink.es/l/1813710a45f7ad72c654d1b8969aabb76b2dbe22?u=2153471>
>> datatracker.ietf.org
>> <https://l.shortlink.es/l/f580ac31fc41293e66404782d04f732f152894b7?u=2153471>
>> ietf-logo-nor-180.png
>> <https://l.shortlink.es/l/6ee9737ad750a5813c6b12f219cecf793f629eba?u=2153471>
>>
>>
>> <https://l.shortlink.es/l/bb3f349606709332df0d907e89aff9dc4b7929e6?u=2153471>
>> IP Address Space for Outer Space
>> <https://l.shortlink.es/l/dfcc23dabc86dcb97704246bd5d4021672db38ae?u=2153471>
>> datatracker.ietf.org
>> <https://l.shortlink.es/l/bd548e3926b6d9a2b5aa00c5aff588aa31036816?u=2153471>
>> ietf-logo-nor-180.png
>> <https://l.shortlink.es/l/a6be19550bc26f1ed1a4c70512c05f8660594abd?u=2153471>
>>
>>
>> <https://l.shortlink.es/l/82399640efdcef95edca46fbe1251937a241d506?u=2153471>
>>
>> The latter has direct implications for the ARIN community,
>>
>> I would welcome any and all comments.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Tony
>> _______________________________________________
>> ARIN-PPML
>> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
>> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
>> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
>> https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
>> <https://l.shortlink.es/l/b797cf2006b76fefc5570004428285e50c281890?u=2153471>
>> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ARIN-PPML
>> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
>> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
>> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
>> https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml <https://l.shortlink.es/l/71422d60639247323da91e07a7492f203d97e2cc?u=2153471>
>> Please contactinfo at arin.net if you experience any issues.
> _______________________________________________
> ARIN-PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> <https://l.shortlink.es/l/80aa7d1fa73cab6f147abb79995efb94875029fd?u=2153471>
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20260220/b570c666/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ietf-logo-nor-180.png
Type: image/png
Size: 3345 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20260220/b570c666/attachment-0001.png>
More information about the ARIN-PPML
mailing list