[arin-ppml] ARIN-2024-5 Rewrite of NRPM Section 4.4 Micro-Allocation - Community Questions

[Martin Hannigan]

On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 4:27 PM William Herrin <bill at herrin.us> wrote:

> On Sat, Feb 22, 2025 at 2:31 PM Martin Hannigan <hannigan at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Today, it is clear that neither gTLDs nor sTLDs require special support
> or protection within ARIN policy. ccTLD, [and] the root [do]
>
> Hi Martin,
>
> That seems fair. What do the rest of you think? Is this correct? Incorrect?
>
>
> > clarifying that the allocations are for the ccTLD's themselves, not
> their hosters would also be appropriate.
>
> I've been wondering about this. Do you have any language in mind?
>
> My thoughts have been more toward the transfer side of the equation,
> making sure the addresses stay with the critical infrastructure.
> Instead of relying on section 8.2, would it be reasonable to set
> explicit transfer requirements? Maybe something like:
>

I may have changed my mind about this after digging deeper. Once you read
the rest of the thread I know you will understand.


> 8.7 Critical Internet Infrastructure
>
> Addresses allocated under section 4.4 Critical Internet Infrastructure
> shall be transferred only to the subsequent operator of the critical
> infrastructure.
>
> What do you think?
>

This seems like a good question for VGRS, Afilias CIRA, PCH, etc.

Thanks!

-M<
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20250224/5eeb44be/attachment-0001.htm>