[arin-ppml] ARIN-2023-8: Reduce 4.1.8 Maximum Allocation

[Douglas Camin]

I’m going to put myself out here a bit:

I’m for 3. I think there should be a policy proposal put forward to eliminate the waitlist and reallocate the addresses going there to replenish other pools.

Is there community support for that? Maybe, maybe not. I don’t know definitively how I feel about doing it as I want to hear other feedback from people who know a lot more than me, and I’m very open to that input. But I think committing it to the proposal process and soliciting feedback via that path is the best course of action.

Other than that, I’m for 2 as it at least gets closer to my understanding of what the waitlist was created for by cutting the wait time down dramatically.

Also - I appreciate all your work on this policy, Gerry. Yeoman’s work.


Doug





--

Douglas J. Camin

doug at dougcamin.com

From: ARIN-PPML <arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net> on behalf of William Herrin <bill at herrin.us>
Date: Wednesday, December 18, 2024 at 5:32 PM
To: Gerry E.. George <ggeorge at digisolv.com>
Cc: arin-ppml at arin.net <arin-ppml at arin.net>
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN-2023-8: Reduce 4.1.8 Maximum Allocation

On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 12:10 PM Gerry E.. George <ggeorge at digisolv.com> wrote:
> We are now seeing 4 feasible options for this Draft Policy:
> 1. Consider revised policy as written (with proposed retroactive protections - still 3+-year lag and wait times);
> 2. Consider policy without any retroactive protections (reduction in wait times by ⅔s);
> 3. Do away with the Waitlist completely (new policy would be required);
> 4. Abandon the policy (essentially, do nothing, no changes to current operations)

Howdy,

I like option 1. The current state of the waitlist is unreasonable.
It's obvious to me that we don't have consensus for option 2. If we
get a bright idea in option 3's space, it can supplant anything we do
now with option 1. If we do nothing then in three years the state of
the waitlist will still be unreasonable. And will still be years away
from being reasonable. So I support  option 1.

Regards,
Bill Herrin



--
William Herrin
bill at herrin.us
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbill.herrin.us%2F&data=05%7C02%7C%7Cfd1db8f887b1445f1bd808dd1fb3dab2%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C638701579529518529%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=93IMgW9mkVqXtCSqWANXnT5V%2BpBcVl2KhTCKRIVl4gU%3D&reserved=0<https://bill.herrin.us/>
_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.arin.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Farin-ppml&data=05%7C02%7C%7Cfd1db8f887b1445f1bd808dd1fb3dab2%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C638701579529541791%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=iq78iVGRqWEFznl5uSI83ug7mh4EU1nGYahmu0gwWWw%3D&reserved=0<https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml>
Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20241219/e1e324e3/attachment.htm>