[arin-ppml] AC candidates
Mike Burns
mike at iptrading.com
Thu Oct 26 11:12:20 EDT 2023
Hi Bill,
Fair enough, most people interested in this are likely to have some conflicts and it's important to consider those.
If we unilaterally excluded all candidates with conflicts though, candidate pickings would be even slimmer.
Regards,
Mike
---- On Thu,26 Oct 2023 17:22:13 -0400 bill at herrin.us wrote ----On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 6:58 AM Mike Burns <mike at iptrading.com> wrote:
> And I agree with Fernando that affiliations or connections to
> IP brokers would be a point in their favor considering they
> are the people distributing IPv4 addresses these days.
Hi Mike,
Before considering someone affiliated with an address broker for an
ARIN position, I'd want them to demonstrate that they recognize the
conflict of interest that's likely to pose and have a well conceived
plan for addressing it.
Conflict of interest corrupts even the best intentioned. I once quit a
job I liked because despite his good intentions my boss unsuccessfully
managed his conflict of interest. It placed me in a position where I
couldn't properly oversee the prime vendor. So I'm sensitive to
conflicts of interest.
Regards,
Bill Herrin
--
William Herrin
bill at herrin.us
https://bill.herrin.us/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20231026/534972df/attachment.htm>
More information about the ARIN-PPML
mailing list