[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2022-3: Remove Officer Attestation Requirement for 8.5.5
anita.nikolich at gmail.com
Mon Sep 12 14:23:58 EDT 2022
Taking off my ARIN AC hat and speaking personally, I oppose this.
I believe - even though it's not perfect - keeping the requirement in place
provides a form of risk mitigation both for organizations and for ARIN.
On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 11:51 AM Joe Provo <ppml at rsuc.gweep.net> wrote:
> Hey folks,
> We haven't had any feedback here after the publication
> of the Staff & Legal review as noted in Matthew's message
> below. Given that it speaks directly to concerns raised
> here on PPML, we need community feedback here to confirm
> *our* impressions.
> Please let us know!
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 12:50:13PM -0700, Matthew Wilder wrote:
> > Hi PPML,
> > Staff and Legal review has been conducted for Draft Policy ARIN-2022-3.
> > relevant bit for the community to consider is the legal review, which is
> > follows:
> > "No material legal issue. Removal of the officer attestation would not
> > materially impact ARIN???s ability to pursue cases of fraud."
> > As shepherds, we believe this directly resolves the primary concern
> > by members of the community.
> > For the full staff and legal review, please check the following:
> > Regards,
> > *Matthew Wilder*
> > On Wed, Aug 3, 2022 at 12:24 PM Matthew Wilder <matthew.wilder at telus.com
> > wrote:
> > > Hi PPML,
> > >
> > > I appreciate the lively discussion thus far on ARIN-2022-3, including
> > > concerns around what prosecutorial powers might be lost if officer
> > > attestations are no longer required. Thanks also to staff for
> > > the result of the ACSP Consultation 2021.4 retiring the officer
> > > requirement for documentation of needs assessment.
> > >
> > > The prevailing concern in the community around ARIN-2022-3 appears to
> > > that removing officer attestation would impede the prosecution of those
> > > conducting fraud. In order to have the experts address this concern, I
> > > (along with my fellow policy shepherd Joe) have requested a staff and
> > > review. Our hope is that staff (and legal counsel in particular) might
> > > directly weigh in on how important the officer attestation is.
> > >
> > > We will make sure that relevant points are highlighted back to PPML for
> > > the community to consider in further discussion of the draft policy.
> > >
> > > Warm regards,
> > >
> > > *Matthew Wilder*
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ARIN-PPML
> > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> > the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> > https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> > Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
> Posted from my personal account - see X-Disclaimer header.
> Joe Provo / Gweep / Earthling
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ARIN-PPML