[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2022-3: Remove Officer Attestation Requirement for 8.5.5

Joe Provo ppml at rsuc.gweep.net
Mon Sep 12 12:51:21 EDT 2022


Hey folks,

We haven't had any feedback here after the publication
of the Staff & Legal review as noted in Matthew's message 
below.  Given that it speaks directly to concerns raised 
here on PPML, we need community feedback here to confirm
*our* impressions.

Please let us know!

Joe


On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 12:50:13PM -0700, Matthew Wilder wrote:
> Hi PPML,
> 
> Staff and Legal review has been conducted for Draft Policy ARIN-2022-3. The
> relevant bit for the community to consider is the legal review, which is as
> follows:
> "No material legal issue. Removal of the officer attestation would not
> materially impact ARIN???s ability to pursue cases of fraud."
> 
> As shepherds, we believe this directly resolves the primary concern voiced
> by members of the community.
> 
> For the full staff and legal review, please check the following:
> https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/drafts/2022_3/#staff-and-legal-review-15-august-2022
> 
> Regards,
> 
> *Matthew Wilder*
> 
> 
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2022 at 12:24 PM Matthew Wilder <matthew.wilder at telus.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > Hi PPML,
> >
> > I appreciate the lively discussion thus far on ARIN-2022-3, including
> > concerns around what prosecutorial powers might be lost if officer
> > attestations are no longer required. Thanks also to staff for summarizing
> > the result of the ACSP Consultation 2021.4 retiring the officer attestation
> > requirement for documentation of needs assessment.
> >
> > The prevailing concern in the community around ARIN-2022-3 appears to be
> > that removing officer attestation would impede the prosecution of those
> > conducting fraud. In order to have the experts address this concern, I
> > (along with my fellow policy shepherd Joe) have requested a staff and legal
> > review. Our hope is that staff (and legal counsel in particular) might
> > directly weigh in on how important the officer attestation is.
> >
> > We will make sure that relevant points are highlighted back to PPML for
> > the community to consider in further discussion of the draft policy.
> >
> > Warm regards,
> >
> > *Matthew Wilder*
> >

> _______________________________________________
> ARIN-PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.


-- 
Posted from my personal account - see X-Disclaimer header.
Joe Provo / Gweep / Earthling 



More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list