[arin-ppml] Revised - Draft Policy ARIN-2021-4: Clarifications to Sections 8.3, 8.4 and 8.5.6

Scott Leibrand scottleibrand at gmail.com
Sat Jan 22 15:30:14 EST 2022


You answered an either-or question with a Y. I’m not on the AC, but if I were the shepherd on this proposal I would not be able to incorporate your opinion into my assessment of community consensus for or against this policy proposal. If you want your opinion to be considered, you might want to express it in English. 

Scott

> On Jan 22, 2022, at 12:16 PM, Mattapally Technologies <technologiesmattapally at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Y
> 
>> On Saturday, January 22, 2022, Scott Leibrand <scottleibrand at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Are you disagreeing with Owen, or objecting to some part of the proposed changes from 2021-4? If the latter, which change, and why? Despite my initial concerns, it doesn’t appear that it actually changes policy with regard to inter-region ASN transfers, which have been allowed for years. 
>> 
>> Scott
>> 
>>>> On Jan 22, 2022, at 3:23 AM, Mattapally Technologies <technologiesmattapally at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>> -1
>>> 
>>>> On Friday, January 21, 2022, Owen DeLong via ARIN-PPML <arin-ppml at arin.net> wrote:
>>>> There’s a valid argument to be made that there is no longer any (technical) valid reason to treat 16 and 32-bit ASNs differently… ASNs are ASNs today.
>>>> 
>>>> Owen
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On Jan 21, 2022, at 09:58 , Fernando Frediani <fhfrediani at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> I tend to think that transfers originally exists due to IPv4 exhaustion and that is justified. IPv6 and 32-bit ASN don't have the same justification, only 16-bit ASN.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I would also like to understand it better.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Fernando
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 21/01/2022 14:18, Scott Leibrand wrote:
>>>>>> Are Inter-regional transfers of ASNs allowed via policy today? If not, this is a substantive change on that topic, and the draft policy should be retitled accordingly. 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I have no objections to allowing inter-regional ASN transfers, but would like to see an explicit argument if we are proposing to change whether it is allowed, even if that’s as simple as “some orgs want to do it”.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Scott
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Jan 21, 2022, at 7:42 AM, ARIN <info at arin.net> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Inter-regional transfers of IPv4 number resources and ASNs
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> ARIN-PPML
>>>>>> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
>>>>>> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
>>>>>> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
>>>>>> https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
>>>>>> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> ARIN-PPML
>>>>> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
>>>>> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
>>>>> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
>>>>> https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
>>>>> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> ARIN-PPML
>>> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
>>> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
>>> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
>>> https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
>>> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20220122/72003be9/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list