[arin-ppml] Revised - Draft Policy ARIN-2021-4: Clarifications to Sections 8.3, 8.4 and 8.5.6
owen at delong.com
Fri Jan 21 19:42:03 EST 2022
There’s a valid argument to be made that there is no longer any (technical) valid reason to treat 16 and 32-bit ASNs differently… ASNs are ASNs today.
> On Jan 21, 2022, at 09:58 , Fernando Frediani <fhfrediani at gmail.com> wrote:
> I tend to think that transfers originally exists due to IPv4 exhaustion and that is justified. IPv6 and 32-bit ASN don't have the same justification, only 16-bit ASN.
> I would also like to understand it better.
> On 21/01/2022 14:18, Scott Leibrand wrote:
>> Are Inter-regional transfers of ASNs allowed via policy today? If not, this is a substantive change on that topic, and the draft policy should be retitled accordingly.
>> I have no objections to allowing inter-regional ASN transfers, but would like to see an explicit argument if we are proposing to change whether it is allowed, even if that’s as simple as “some orgs want to do it”.
>>> On Jan 21, 2022, at 7:42 AM, ARIN <info at arin.net> <mailto:info at arin.net> wrote:
>>> Inter-regional transfers of IPv4 number resources and ASNs
>> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
>> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net <mailto:ARIN-PPML at arin.net>).
>> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
>> https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml <https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml>
>> Please contact info at arin.net <mailto:info at arin.net> if you experience any issues.
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ARIN-PPML