[arin-ppml] Revised - Draft Policy ARIN-2021-4: Clarifications to Sections 8.3, 8.4 and 8.5.6

Fernando Frediani fhfrediani at gmail.com
Fri Jan 21 12:58:13 EST 2022

I tend to think that transfers originally exists due to IPv4 exhaustion 
and that is justified. IPv6 and 32-bit ASN don't have the same 
justification, only 16-bit ASN.

I would also like to understand it better.


On 21/01/2022 14:18, Scott Leibrand wrote:
> Are Inter-regional transfers of ASNs allowed via policy today? If not, 
> this is a substantive change on that topic, and the draft policy 
> should be retitled accordingly.
> I have no objections to allowing inter-regional ASN transfers, but 
> would like to see an explicit argument if we are proposing to change 
> whether it is allowed, even if that’s as simple as “some orgs want to 
> do it”.
> Scott
>> On Jan 21, 2022, at 7:42 AM, ARIN <info at arin.net> wrote:
>> Inter-regional transfers of IPv4 number resources and ASNs
> _______________________________________________
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contactinfo at arin.net  if you experience any issues.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20220121/416211fe/attachment.htm>

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list