[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2021-6: Permit IPv4 Leased Addresses for Purposes of Determining Utilizatio
fhfrediani at gmail.com
Mon Aug 8 17:12:11 EDT 2022
On 08/08/2022 17:48, John Santos wrote:
> I found the policy and original problem statement confusing because
> the verb "lease" is ambiguous. It can refer to leasing something FROM
> someone else or to leasing something TO someone else.
> I read the problem statement as describing a situation where someone
> has some amount of IP space allocated to them but has an operational
> need for more space. They are leasing additional space from a third
> party as a temporary measure, but would like to increase their
> allocation to cover their actual needs, but ARIN wasn't letting them
> use that leased space as evidence of need. (Maybe this isn't actually
> an issue and any organization in such a situation would easily meet
> the needs requirements?) But if this is the situation the policy is
> attempting to address and it is a real problem, I would support the
> However, it appears this policy is addressing the other situation, an
> organization already has more space than it needs and is leasing out
> their extra space to third parties. (The key word here is
> "leased-out".) I don't see how allowing them to obtain additional
> space in any way qualifies as "needs based". They already have more
> than they need, or they wouldn't be leasing it out.
+1 for the same reasons stated. Doesn't make sense to allow this. Opposed.
> On 8/8/2022 3:11 PM, Andrew Dul wrote:
>> ARIN Draft Policy 2021-6 was retitled earlier this year as “Permit
>> IPv4 Leased Addresses for Purposes of Determining Utilization for
>> Future Allocations” and the text was also updated based upon feedback
>> from the community at the Fall 2021 meeting.
>> The draft did not receive sufficient support in the shepherds opinion
>> to move this policy toward a recommended draft policy. Since this
>> time the shepherds have been discussing with various members of the
>> Internet Community and the ARIN AC on a possible path forward for
>> this draft policy.
>> One of the ideas was to take a look at the problem statement and
>> perhaps update and clarify the problem statement in hopes that this
>> process would provide additional ideas to move the process forward.
>> The current draft policy problem statement is as follows:
>> Problem Statement: Current ARIN policy prevents the use of leased-out
>> addresses as evidence of utilization.
>> Some contributors have suggested that there are perhaps two or more
>> issues that are attempting to be solved here.
>> Organizations would like the ability to lease some of their
>> address space and not limit the receipt of future IPv4 transfers due
>> the fact that ARIN’s evaluation of utilization considers leased space
>> today to be unused.
>> Organizations who wish to obtain address space are not able to
>> pledge the address space as collateral in a financial transaction.
>> The RSA and ARIN policy today limit the ability of IPv4 address
>> resources to be transferred to another party (financier) without that
>> party showing need for use on an operational network.
>> We invite your feedback on these thoughts and ideas to help us rework
>> the problem statement and future policy language solving these issues.
>> In particular, do you believe the problem statement needs to be
>> rewritten to clarify the issue the Internet Community is trying to
>> solve here?
>> If so, what problem or problems do you believe that the Internet
>> Community needs to solve and what problem statement(s) make sense to
>> restart the conversation around this topic?
>> Thanks in advance for your feedback,
>> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
>> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
>> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
>> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
More information about the ARIN-PPML