[arin-ppml] Proposal - Remove Initial Small Assignment Requirements for IPv6

[Larry R. Dockery]

Aside from it making ULA+NTPv6 a smart move, perhaps even best practice for the majority of businesses to adopt rather than allow PA-ISP lock-in, no.

With the mentioned routing issue not being sustainable however, my proposal is likely DOA.

Thank you.

From: Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com>
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2021 9:00 AM
To: Larry R. Dockery <lrdocker at co.douglas.or.us>
Cc: arin-ppml at arin.net
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Proposal - Remove Initial Small Assignment Requirements for IPv6

Is there a reason that you think the majority of small businesses that are not going to multi home should
receive PI addresses rather than use PA?

I’m neither in favor nor opposed at this time, but the answer to the above question is pivotal to whether
this proposal serves an actual need or merely panders to the idea of PI for everybody, which until we
change our routing technology to separate locators from identifiers isn’t sustainable.

Owen



On Sep 13, 2021, at 07:51 , Larry R. Dockery <lrdocker at co.douglas.or.us<mailto:lrdocker at co.douglas.or.us>> wrote:

https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/proposals/2021/ARIN_prop_301_orig/

I would like to hear community feedback on this proposal. Thank you.
_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net<mailto:ARIN-PPML at arin.net>).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact info at arin.net<mailto:info at arin.net> if you experience any issues.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20210913/838a3c48/attachment.htm>