[arin-ppml] ARIN Announces the Final Slate of Candidates for the 2021 ARIN Elections
cja at daydream.com
Tue Oct 19 16:55:33 EDT 2021
as someone who has been nominated twice and not chosen as a candidate I
have asked for (in addition to transparency)
- The results of the background check of me that was done as part of the
- The synopsis of the interview with the contractor who interviews
candidates and gives a synopsis to the nomcom.
The interview with the consultant is new and who knows what that person
tells the nomcom? The first time I was interviewed by the nomcom but was
not told who was on the call that day. It was super weird.
These requests went unanswered by the nomcom. I got a "that's a good
suggestion I'll look into it" and then nothing.
On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 2:44 PM Leif Sawyer <lsawyer at gci.com> wrote:
> Mike -
> Speaking only as myself, and not as a member of the AC or the NomCom:
> I hear your frustrations for transparency, and I have formulated a
> suggestion that I've shared with the NomCom to improve the way that
> candidate responses are handled.
> To wit -
> I've suggested simple, impartial, boilerplate language that would be
> used for all candidates, to show where those candidates were marked as
> "needing additional improvement"
> Examples of those areas were:
> ethics, business, governance, communication, finance, and education
> There is obviously room for other areas. I'd love to hear what your
> thoughts would be.
> Leif Sawyer
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ARIN-PPML