[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2021-3: Private AS Number and Unique Routing Policy Clarifications

[Michael B. Williams]

Agreed that this should be updated to illustrate that BGP is an example.
Whilst it may be the most likely candidate currently, new and emerging
technologies may come along :)

Michael

------------------------------

*Michael B. Williams *
Glexia - An IT Company

Book a Meeting With Me <https://calendly.com/glexia-michael-williams>

USA Direct: +1 978 477 6797
USA Toll Free: +1 800 675 0297 x101
AUS Direct: +61 3 8594 2265
AUS Toll Free: +61 1800 931 724 x101
Fax: +1.815-301-5570

Michael.Williams at glexia.com
https://www.glexia.com/
Legal Notice:
The information in this electronic mail message is the sender's
confidential business and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely
for the addressee(s). Access to this internet electronic mail message by
anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any
disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be
taken in reliance on it is prohibited and may be unlawful.



On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 11:48 PM John Santos <john at egh.com> wrote:

> I tend to agree with Scott.  In particular, the rewording proposed by
> Chris
> would make using BGP the ONLY protocol that would require a unique AS
> number, as
> opposed to the original wording and Scott's version, which would make BGP
> an
> example of such a situation.
>
>
>
> On 7/20/2021 11:29 PM, Scott Leibrand wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 12:52 PM ARIN <info at arin.net <mailto:
> info at arin.net>> wrote:
> > [...]
> > Another way to address the issue Chris raised here would be to just add
> the word
> > "with" before Border Gateway Protocol, so it reads "...using a unique
> routing
> > policy, such as with Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) ..."
> > [...]
> >     “AS Numbers should be requested when an organization has network
> plans ready
> >     and is either planning to use a unique routing policy (such as BGP)
> or has a
> >     unique need for an AS Number.”
> >
> >
> > Adding "with", so it reads "(such as with BGP)" would also be a good
> > clarification here.
> >
> > -Scott
>
> (Something wonky with the quoting happened above; I think my email client
> lost a
> layer of >'s, and the deleted quoted text from the ARIN announcement had
> lots of
> underscores where there should have been text, making it almost
> unreadable.  I
> hope people can get my point from context.  Unfortunately, I already
> deleted
> Chris's email so I don't have the revised proposal in front of me to paste
> back in.)
>
> --
> John Santos
> Evans Griffiths & Hart, Inc.
> 781-861-0670 ext 539
> _______________________________________________
> ARIN-PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20210721/8ec24b5d/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5326 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20210721/8ec24b5d/attachment.p7s>