[arin-ppml] Open Petition for ARIN-2020-2

Martin Hannigan hannigan at gmail.com
Fri Jan 15 22:10:53 EST 2021

On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 4:47 PM Tom Fantacone <tom at iptrading.com> wrote:

> The petition process calls for volume (support of 25 separate orgs), and
> does not request "substance".  The substance has been discussed at length,
> and I assume the +1 votes from these network operators come about through
> substantive, rational thought.
Tom, I politely recommend you re-reread what I said. I never challenged the
petition requirement.

> But since you raised the issue of substance, here's the substance of the
> thinking for my own support for the petition.  I originally proposed the
> wait list block size limit of a /22

[ clip ]

I appreciate your comment and will duly note it for future reference. Thank

> I imagine most of the support from these *"newbies"* is based on the
> essential unfairness of harming dozens of legitimate players in order to
> prevent potential fraud of a few.  But I don't want to put words in their
> mouths.  I welcome their input and look forward to their participation in
> the future.

I'm pleased to see that IPv4 brokers are aligned with people who believe
the wait list actually meets their immediate needs.

Warm regards,

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20210115/4f50e188/attachment.htm>

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list