[arin-ppml] Open Petition for ARIN-2020-2
hannigan at gmail.com
Fri Jan 15 22:10:53 EST 2021
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 4:47 PM Tom Fantacone <tom at iptrading.com> wrote:
> The petition process calls for volume (support of 25 separate orgs), and
> does not request "substance". The substance has been discussed at length,
> and I assume the +1 votes from these network operators come about through
> substantive, rational thought.
Tom, I politely recommend you re-reread what I said. I never challenged the
> But since you raised the issue of substance, here's the substance of the
> thinking for my own support for the petition. I originally proposed the
> wait list block size limit of a /22
[ clip ]
I appreciate your comment and will duly note it for future reference. Thank
> I imagine most of the support from these *"newbies"* is based on the
> essential unfairness of harming dozens of legitimate players in order to
> prevent potential fraud of a few. But I don't want to put words in their
> mouths. I welcome their input and look forward to their participation in
> the future.
I'm pleased to see that IPv4 brokers are aligned with people who believe
the wait list actually meets their immediate needs.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ARIN-PPML