[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2020-2: Grandfathering of Organizations Removed from Waitlist by Implementation of ARIN-2019-16
mike at iptrading.com
Fri Jan 15 15:21:38 EST 2021
Count me as embarrassed at the treatment of new posters on this list.
Demeaned as recipients of payments for expressing their opinion, mocked for offering support without establishing bona fides.
Dismissed because no reasoning is provided in support of their opinions.
And finally attacked when they do.
I hope the Trustees who will make this decision are aware of the importance of bottom-up, stakeholder governance, and realize these numerous expressions of support might be the first steps of these posters towards the kind of ongoing community participation we claim to value.
Aren’t we all sick of the same voices?
PS ARIN does not require resource holders use NAT, much less CGNAT.
If you feel that should be a requirement, write a policy proposal.
From: ARIN-PPML <arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net> On Behalf Of Robert Clarke
Sent: Friday, January 15, 2021 2:55 PM
To: Jay Wendelin <jmw at poweredbystl.com>
Cc: arin-ppml at arin.net
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2020-2: Grandfathering of Organizations Removed from Waitlist by Implementation of ARIN-2019-16
Isn't this like saying "please give me free land so I can lease it onto schools and other noble public institutions?"
I don't feel like this argument has weight nor does your business take priority over the actual non profit businesses that won't get allocations because of this policy.
On Jan 15, 2021, at 8:29 AM, Jay Wendelin <jmw at poweredbystl.com <mailto:jmw at poweredbystl.com> > wrote:
I support this petition, I have many Public School Clients that rely on their ISP’s to manage and offer IP address.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ARIN-PPML