[arin-ppml] Open Petition for ARIN-2020-2
hannigan at gmail.com
Thu Jan 14 22:41:50 EST 2021
Not quite what I had in mind. However, you demonstrated the point. Volume
!= substance. Personally, I find the AC to be too activist on occasion.
However I see nothing that needs repair here. I applaud use of the petition
process as it is part of the pdp. The petition itself, while long and
detailed, lacks enough substance itself to make me want to support it.
Your mileage may vary.
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 5:31 PM Tom Fantacone <tom at iptrading.com> wrote:
> Well, since you asked, I do support the petition.
> Tom Fantacone
> ------- Original Message -------
> *From :* Martin Hannigan[mailto:hannigan at gmail.com]
> *Sent :* 1/13/2021 5:20:04 PM
> *To :* arin-ppml at arin.net
> *Cc :*
> *Subject :* RE: Re: [arin-ppml] Open Petition for ARIN-2020-2
> Anyone else going to say it?
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 16:36 Annette Ogden <
> annetteo at anderson-electric.com> wrote:
>> I support this petition.
>> *Annette Ogden*
>> Anderson Electric, Inc.
>> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
>> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
>> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
>> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ARIN-PPML