[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2020-2: Grandfathering of Organizations Removed from Waitlist by Implementation of ARIN-2019-16
hostmaster at uneedus.com
hostmaster at uneedus.com
Thu Jul 16 07:59:11 EDT 2020
I am also against this proposal.
If we allow holders of larger blocks back onto the list, we take away
blocks that should go to smaller holders.
The waiting list is NOT a lottery to be "won", and I think the policy
should not change.
Albert Erdmann
Network Administrator
Paradise On Line Inc.
On Wed, 15 Jul 2020, Andrew Dul wrote:
>
> I do not support the reintroduction of organizations onto the wait-list who were removed due to having existing address holdings larger than a /20. Being
> on the wait-list was never a guarantee that you would receive space. The AC had to balance the various elements of block size and organizations who would
> be eligible to receive space under the updated policy and we were aware that the rules as implemented would prevent some organizations on the wait-list from
> receiving blocks going forward.
>
> Speaking only for myself, not the AC
>
> Andrew
>
> On 6/19/2020 11:25 AM, Alyssa Moore wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> There was some great discussion of this policy proposal at ARIN45. We hear a wide range of views including:
> 1. Don't grandfather organizations. The new waitlist policy is sound.
> 2. Organizations that were on the waitlist before 2019-16 should be eligible for their original request size (even if it exceeds the new limit
> of a /22).
> 3. Organizations that were on the waitlist before 2019-16 should remain eligible if their holdings exceed a /20 OR a /18. The draft policy
> under discussion specifies a /18 total holdings for grandfathered orgs, while the current waitlist policy (2019-16) specifies a /20.
> 4. Organizations that were on the waitlist before 2019-16 should be eligible regardless of their total holdings because that was not a
> restriction of the policy under which they originally qualified for the waitlist.
> There was general support to continue finessing this draft. If you have views on the above noted parameters, please make them known here.
>
> For reference:
>
> Old waitlist policy
> 1. Requester specifies smallest block they'd be willing to accept, equal to or larger than the applicable minimum size specified elsewhere in ARIN
> policy.
> 2. Did not place a limit on the total existing IP address holdings of a party eligible for the waitlist.
> 3. Made resources issued from the waitlist ineligible for transfer until after a period of 12 months.
> New Waitlist Policy
> 1. Limits the size of block ARIN can issue on the waitlist to a /22.
> 2. Places a limit on the total existing IP address holdings of a party eligible for the waitlist at a /20 or less.
> 3. Makes resources issued from the waitlist ineligible for transfer until after a period of 60 months.
>
> Best,
> Alyssa
>
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 3:35 PM David Farmer <farmer at umn.edu> wrote:
> I support this policy and believe the policy development process is the proper place to handle this issue. However, this policy seems to
> be implementable as a one-time policy directive to ARIN Staff. Once implemented, by putting the effected organizations back on the waiting
> list, it seems unnecessary to memorialized the text in the NRPM, it would immediately become extraneous and potentially confusing to
> future readers of the NRPM.
> Therefore, I would like to recommend the Policy Statement not be added to the NRPM upon its implementation. I believe this to be consistent with
> the intent of the policy. Otherwise, does ARIN Staff have procedural advice on how best to handle what seems like a one-time directive?
>
> Thanks
>
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 12:21 PM ARIN <info at arin.net> wrote:
>
> Draft Policy ARIN-2020-2: Grandfathering of Organizations Removed from
> Waitlist by Implementation of ARIN-2019-16
>
> Problem Statement:
>
> The implementation of the ARIN-2019-16 Advisory Council Recommendation
> Regarding NRPM 4.1.8: Unmet Requests caused some organizations to be
> removed from the waiting list that were approved under the old policy’s
> eligibility criteria. These organizations should have been grandfathered
> when the waitlist was reopened to allow them to receive an allocation of
> IPv4 up to the new policy’s maximum size constraint of a /22.
>
> Policy Statement: Update NRPM Section 4.1.8 as follows:
>
> Add section 4.1.8.3 (temporary language in the NRPM to remain until the
> policy objective is achieved)
>
> Restoring organizations to the waitlist
>
> ARIN will restore organizations that were removed from the waitlist at
> the adoption of ARIN-2019-16 to their previous position if their total
> holdings of IPv4 address space amounts to a /18 or less. The maximum
> size aggregate that a reinstated organization may qualify for is a /22.
>
> All restored organizations extend their 2 year approval by [number of
> months between July 2019 and implementation of new policy]. Any requests
> met through a transfer will be considered fulfilled and removed from the
> waiting list.
>
> Comments:
>
> Timetable for implementation: Immediate
>
> Anything Else: While attending ARIN 44 and discussing this with other
> community members the vast majority indicated that they agreed that some
> organizations were treated unfairly. This proposal is a remedy.
> _______________________________________________
> ARIN-PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>
>
>
> --
> ===============================================
> David Farmer Email:farmer at umn.edu
> Networking & Telecommunication Services
> Office of Information Technology
> University of Minnesota
> 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815
> Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952
> ===============================================
> _______________________________________________
> ARIN-PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ARIN-PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>
>
>
More information about the ARIN-PPML
mailing list