[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2020-2: Grandfathering of Organizations Removed from Waitlist by Implementation of ARIN-2019-16

[Ralph Sims]

I support the concept.  While we realized we might not ever get our request for a block, we needed to take steps to be in the queue and were denied a /22 because we had an original /20 (and a /24 from being on a previous list).

From: ARIN-PPML <arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net> On Behalf Of Andrew Dul
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2020 1:40 PM
To: arin-ppml at arin.net
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2020-2: Grandfathering of Organizations Removed from Waitlist by Implementation of ARIN-2019-16


I do not support the reintroduction of organizations onto the wait-list who were removed due to having existing address holdings larger than a /20.  Being on the wait-list was never a guarantee that you would receive space.  The AC had to balance the various elements of block size and organizations who would be eligible to receive space under the updated policy and we were aware that the rules as implemented would prevent some organizations on the wait-list from receiving blocks going forward.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20200715/a8cba662/attachment.htm>