[arin-ppml] ARIN-2019-19 Require IPv6 before receiving Section 8 IPv4 Transfers
trelane at trelane.net
Sun Jan 19 22:08:04 EST 2020
I post here very rarely to not at all but your assertion that "IPv6 is
leveling off" ranges somewhere between insane and drug-addled.
I will, however, give you the benefit of the doubt, and label it merely
With this said, I am no across the board for forcing IPv6 allocation or
adoption, though I have very little IP space, or say.
On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 9:38 PM Michel Py <
michel at arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us> wrote:
> How many times do we need to say no no no no ?
> I have a stern warning : as it is obvious that IPv6 is leveling off,
> people who are supporting the 100% IPv6 dream have to worry about their
> next employment, should their current one changes.
> Never before in history, a protocol has failed for 20 years to deploy and
> become predominant. Needless to say, this warning applies to ARIN
> leadership as well.
> IPv6 : I.S.D.N. I still don’t need.
> Some people archive this mailing list. This effort is about artificially
> inflating IPv6 adoption numbers.
> I understand that the ultimate political skill is the ability to turn
> their coat, but don't wait until it's too late. Whoever is favoring IPv6 as
> the standard Internet protocol in 2020 is doing it on the record, at the
> risk of their very employment.
> I hope I have been clear enough.
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ARIN-PPML