[arin-ppml] ARIN-2019-19 Require IPv6 before receiving Section 8 IPv4 Transfers

Martin Hannigan hannigan at gmail.com
Mon Jan 13 15:08:05 EST 2020

On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 12:06 PM Andrew Dul <andrew.dul at quark.net> wrote:

> Happy New Year everyone...
> We had a robust discussion on this list before the New Year, but it was
> clear that we don't have consensus on the current draft.  Thus to help move
> this draft forward...  I'm proposing a couple of questions to see if we can
> find middle ground here to update the text of the draft policy.
> The policy as written today would require organizations who wish to obtain
> an IPv4 transfer to complete a limited scope IPv6 deployment.
> Do you support any IPv6 requirements on an IPv4 transfer?

No. ARINs job isn't to mandate how the Internet should work. Its to make it
easy to acquire legitimately needed resources and to maintain an accurate

Would you support IPv6 requirements for receiving a block via the ARIN
> wait-list?


Do you support different IPv6 deployment criteria that would qualify an
> organization for a IPv4 transfer?  (Such as, just requiring the org to have
> an IPv6 allocation or assignment from ARIN)  Please propose different IPv6
> criteria that you would support if the current criteria is unacceptable.


The market will sort out v6 (and those who fail) over time.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20200113/f1d3bcc2/attachment.htm>

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list