[arin-ppml] ARIN-2019-19 Require IPv6 before receiving Section 8 IPv4 Transfers

Jo Rhett jrhett at netconsonance.com
Mon Jan 13 13:07:07 EST 2020

On Mon, Jan 13, 2020, at 9:56 AM, Scott Leibrand wrote:
> Requiring an IPv6 allocation/assignment, or even requiring someone to route an IPv6 block, wouldn't drive adoption enough to be meaningful.

This is unfortunately true, and I agree completely with Scott.

If I could think of a way to help drive adoption I'd be 100% in favor of it. But I don't think that tying up registry resources around enforcement is worth the benefit, as compared to other promotional efforts.

Jo Rhett
Net Consonance : net philanthropy to improve open source and internet projects.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20200113/9d61b298/attachment.htm>

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list