[arin-ppml] Fwd: Advisory Council Meeting Results - December 2019
hannigan at gmail.com
Sat Jan 4 22:28:43 EST 2020
On Sat, Jan 4, 2020 at 20:15 David Farmer <farmer at umn.edu> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 4, 2020 at 17:27 Ronald F. Guilmette <rfg at tristatelogic.com>
>> In message <
>> CAMDXq5Mbe2dn9aWxho-H-p8G3yqwbaAK-RXr7uQmTaC5PBtyCA at mail.gmail.com>
>> Martin Hannigan <hannigan at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >Talking about v6 exhaustion is probably better suited for the IETF.
>> >way, we'll all be dead if/when it happens...
>> Speak for yourself! I have plans to still be here in 2050! (And I even
>> out some vague hope that some encoding of myself will still be around in
>> to see humanity's construction of its first Dyson sphere.)
> I took Marty as referring to RFC2050 not the year 2050. RFC2050 made
> conservation a primary consideration for IPv4 allocation policies, even at
> the cost of operational complexity. With IPv6 we shouldn’t be profligate,
> but conservation doesn’t need to the primary consideration either,
> operational simplicity can come first, including a multi-year supply on
> initial allocation.
No. I meant the year 2050. But thank you. :-)
Ron, true. We’ll all be here beyond 2050. I hope. :-)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ARIN-PPML