[arin-ppml] ARIN-2019-19 Require IPv6 before receiving Section 8 IPv4 Transfers

[Scott Leibrand]

Please knock it off with the unfounded allegations of drug use before we need to get the AUP committee involved. 

And more broadly, I don’t think it’s helpful to argue about the motivations of IPv6 proponents or whether v6 adoption is continuing or not. The relevant question at hand is whether anyone has proposed an enforceable ARIN policy whose benefits exceed its costs. To date no one has proposed such a policy to further encourage IPv6 adoption, so IMO this discussion will not be useful until/unless someone comes up with a new idea that doesn’t gave all the enforceability and ineffectiveness problems of those proposed so far.  

Scott

> On Jan 20, 2020, at 8:19 AM, Michel Py <michel at arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us> wrote:
> 
> 
>> 
>> Andrew Kirch wrote :
>> I post here very rarely to not at all but your assertion that "IPv6 
>> is leveling off" ranges somewhere between insane and drug-addled.  
>> https://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html 
> 
> Zoom the graph between July 2019 and today and tell us which drug it is you are taking that shows you any growth for the last 6 or 7 months. Must be the good stuff. Shrooms ?
> 
> Michel.
> _______________________________________________
> ARIN-PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.