[arin-ppml] ARIN-2019-19 Require IPv6 before receiving Section 8 IPv4 Transfers

[Daved Daly]

Do you support any IPv6 requirements on an IPv4 transfer?

Yes

Would you support IPv6 requirements for receiving a block via the ARIN
wait-list?

Yes

-Daved Daly

(AS1426)



On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 9:57 AM Scott Leibrand <scottleibrand at gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 9:06 AM Andrew Dul <andrew.dul at quark.net> wrote:
>
>> Happy New Year everyone...
>>
>> We had a robust discussion on this list before the New Year, but it was
>> clear that we don't have consensus on the current draft.  Thus to help move
>> this draft forward...  I'm proposing a couple of questions to see if we can
>> find middle ground here to update the text of the draft policy.
>>
>> The policy as written today would require organizations who wish to
>> obtain an IPv4 transfer to complete a limited scope IPv6 deployment.
>>
>> Do you support any IPv6 requirements on an IPv4 transfer?
>>
>
> Most definitely not.
>
> Would you support IPv6 requirements for receiving a block via the ARIN
>> wait-list?
>>
>> Do you support different IPv6 deployment criteria that would qualify an
>> organization for a IPv4 transfer?  (Such as, just requiring the org to have
>> an IPv6 allocation or assignment from ARIN)  Please propose different IPv6
>> criteria that you would support if the current criteria is unacceptable.
>>
>
> I'm not categorically opposed to IPv6 requirements tied to waitlist
> allocations, but I'm skeptical that there is any set of requirements that
> ARIN could impose that would be fully enforceable, meaningful in enough
> cases to drive adoption, and not onerous.
>
> Requiring an IPv6 allocation/assignment, or even requiring someone to
> route an IPv6 block, wouldn't drive adoption enough to be meaningful.
>
> -Scott
>
>>
>> Thanks for your comments on this draft,
>>
>> Andrew
>>
>>
>> ===
>>
>> *Current Policy Statement:*
>>
>> In section 8.5.2, add the following language to the end of the paragraph
>> entitled “Operational Use”:
>>
>> Such operational network must at minimum include an allocation or
>> assignment by ARIN of IPv6 address space under the same Org ID receiving
>> the transferred IPv4 space. Such Org must be able to prove this IPv6 space
>> is being routed by using it to communicate with ARIN.
>>
>> In the event the receiver provides a written statement from its upstream
>> that IPv6 connectivity is unavailable, the IPv6 requirement may be waived.
>>
>> ===
>> _______________________________________________
>> ARIN-PPML
>> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
>> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
>> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
>> https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
>> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>>
> _______________________________________________
> ARIN-PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20200113/becb6e93/attachment.htm>