[arin-ppml] ARIN-2019-19 Require IPv6 before receiving Section 8 IPv4 Transfers
Scott Leibrand
scottleibrand at gmail.com
Mon Jan 13 12:56:54 EST 2020
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 9:06 AM Andrew Dul <andrew.dul at quark.net> wrote:
> Happy New Year everyone...
>
> We had a robust discussion on this list before the New Year, but it was
> clear that we don't have consensus on the current draft. Thus to help move
> this draft forward... I'm proposing a couple of questions to see if we can
> find middle ground here to update the text of the draft policy.
>
> The policy as written today would require organizations who wish to obtain
> an IPv4 transfer to complete a limited scope IPv6 deployment.
>
> Do you support any IPv6 requirements on an IPv4 transfer?
>
Most definitely not.
Would you support IPv6 requirements for receiving a block via the ARIN
> wait-list?
>
> Do you support different IPv6 deployment criteria that would qualify an
> organization for a IPv4 transfer? (Such as, just requiring the org to have
> an IPv6 allocation or assignment from ARIN) Please propose different IPv6
> criteria that you would support if the current criteria is unacceptable.
>
I'm not categorically opposed to IPv6 requirements tied to waitlist
allocations, but I'm skeptical that there is any set of requirements that
ARIN could impose that would be fully enforceable, meaningful in enough
cases to drive adoption, and not onerous.
Requiring an IPv6 allocation/assignment, or even requiring someone to route
an IPv6 block, wouldn't drive adoption enough to be meaningful.
-Scott
>
> Thanks for your comments on this draft,
>
> Andrew
>
>
> ===
>
> *Current Policy Statement:*
>
> In section 8.5.2, add the following language to the end of the paragraph
> entitled “Operational Use”:
>
> Such operational network must at minimum include an allocation or
> assignment by ARIN of IPv6 address space under the same Org ID receiving
> the transferred IPv4 space. Such Org must be able to prove this IPv6 space
> is being routed by using it to communicate with ARIN.
>
> In the event the receiver provides a written statement from its upstream
> that IPv6 connectivity is unavailable, the IPv6 requirement may be waived.
>
> ===
> _______________________________________________
> ARIN-PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20200113/a1dbe3a3/attachment.htm>
More information about the ARIN-PPML
mailing list