[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2020-3: IPv6 Nano-allocations

John Curran jcurran at arin.net
Sat Apr 18 09:10:56 EDT 2020

On 18 Apr 2020, at 5:32 AM, Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote:
> Policy as written definitely favors /48s for everyone.

Owen - 

To bring it back to the policy matter under discussion, do you expect that ISPs (who presently do not proceed with their IPv6 /36 application due to resulting increase of their annual fees from $250 to $500) would proceed if there were a fee waiver that prevented the increase?  Also, do you believe that these ISPs would indeed be assigning /48’s to customers if given the larger /36 IPv6 allocation and should doing so be a provision of any such fee waiver?


John Curran
President and CEO
American Registry for Internet Numbers

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list