[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2020-3: IPv6 Nano-allocations

William Herrin bill at herrin.us
Tue Apr 14 13:13:12 EDT 2020

On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 9:42 AM Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote:
> > On Apr 14, 2020, at 00:38 , William Herrin <bill at herrin.us> wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 8:48 PM Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote
> >>> While the community doesn't have purview over fees we have input into that process.  If this is something that we would strongly like to prefer as a solution to this problem.  We can make this as a strong suggestion to the board for their consideration.
> >>
> >> Mr. Quixote, Windmill… Windmill, Mr. Quixote.
> >
> > If we have something approaching a consensus that it should happen,
> > maybe it should be a litmus test for the candidates this fall.
> If you can convince enough members, sure… However, it will take at least two cycles of that (so October, 2021 to take effect January, 2022) to get a majority of seats on the board affected.

Hi Owen,

Do we need to turn over a majority? Or do we just need to present the
remaining trustees with clear and convincing evidence that the members
want IPv6 to be cost-neutral to every existing IPv4 registrant?

Bill Herrin

William Herrin
bill at herrin.us

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list