[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2019-4: Allow Inter-regional IPv6 Resource Transfers

David Farmer farmer at umn.edu
Fri Sep 6 15:55:00 EDT 2019

This policy seems to have been overrun by events, the discussion by the
community regarding the general issues involved in this policy seems to
have moved to ARIN-2019-10: Inter-RIR M&A;

ARIN-2019-10 seem to have a better formulation of the issues involved.
However, if you think this policy has a better formulation of the issues
involved in the discussion between this policy and ARIN-2019-10, please
explain why and the AC will consider your arguments. Otherwise, in order to
help simplify and focus the discussion on ARIN-2019-10 at the upcoming ARIN
44 meeting, in my role as an AC shepherd for this policy, I plan to make a
motion to abandon this policy on the next Advisory Council call.

Your feedback is appreciated.

Thank you.

On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 2:52 PM ARIN <info at arin.net> wrote:

> On 21 March 2019, the ARIN Advisory Council (AC) accepted
> "ARIN-prop-263: Allow Inter-regional IPv6 Resource Transfers" as a Draft
> Policy.
> The Draft Policy text is below and can be found at:
> https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/drafts/2019_4/
> You are encouraged to discuss all Draft Policies on PPML. The AC will
> evaluate the discussion in order to assess the conformance of this draft
> policy with ARIN's Principles of Internet number resource policy as
> stated in the Policy Development Process (PDP). Specifically, these
> principles are:
> * Enabling Fair and Impartial Number Resource Administration
> * Technically Sound
> * Supported by the Community
> The PDP can be found at:
> https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/pdp/
> Draft Policies and Proposals under discussion can be found at:
> https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/drafts/
> Regards,
> Sean Hopkins
> Policy Analyst
> American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)
> Draft Policy ARIN-2019-4: Allow Inter-regional IPv6 Resource Transfers
> Problem Statement:
> There is an operational need to allow RIR transfers of IPv6 resources
> between RIRs with an equivalent transfer policy. ARIN’s RPKI Trust
> Anchor (TA) is measurably less widely deployed than TAs from other RIRs.
> As a consequence, RPKI ROAs published through ARIN offer less value.
> Operators seeking to extract the most value from their investment in
> IPv6 would benefit from the ability to transfer IPv6 resources to RIRs
> with more widely deployed RPKI Trust Anchors.
> Policy Statement:
> Change the first sentence in section 8.4 from:
> “Inter-regional transfers of IPv4 number resources and ASNs may take
> place only via RIRs who agree to the transfer and share reciprocal,
> compatible needs-based policies.”
> To:
> “Inter-regional transfers of Internet number resources may take place
> only via RIRs who agree to the transfer and share reciprocal, compatible
> needs-based policies.”
> Comments:
> Timetable for implementation: Immediate
> _______________________________________________
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.

David Farmer               Email:farmer at umn.edu
Networking & Telecommunication Services
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota
2218 University Ave SE        Phone: 612-626-0815
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029   Cell: 612-812-9952
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20190906/1fa548f6/attachment.htm>

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list