[arin-ppml] Recommended Draft Policy ARIN-2019-10: Inter-RIR M&A
SRyerse at eclipse-networks.com
Sun Oct 13 03:38:38 EDT 2019
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 12, 2019, at 6:59 PM, William Herrin <bill at herrin.us> wrote:
On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 6:29 AM <hostmaster at uneedus.com<mailto:hostmaster at uneedus.com>> wrote:
I agree. The only reason for this transfer thing was the shortage of IPv4
addresses and 16 bit ASN numbers. There is no shortage of IPv6 addresses
or 32 bit ASN.
Therefore, I agree that IPv6 transfers and 32 bit ASN transfers should not
be permitted, even for M&A.
I have almost exactly the opposite opinion. No shortage means no cause to game the system. No gaming of the system means the transfer is requested for reasonable, pragmatic causes. Like avoiding renumbering pain. Why should this be prevented?
Where there is a plausible reason to believe someone is gaming the system or just generally being careless and wasteful, that's where I want to see limits and strict evaluation.
bill at herrin.us<mailto:bill at herrin.us>
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ARIN-PPML