[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2019-19: Require IPv6 Before Receiving Section 8 IPv4 Transfers (fwd)
cfriacas at fccn.pt
Thu Nov 14 15:43:31 EST 2019
I wish to express my support to ARIN-2019-19.
We all have our fair share of "undue burdens". :-)
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2019 20:51:22
From: John Curran <jcurran at arin.net>
To: Michel Py <michel at arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us>
Cc: "arin-ppml at arin.net" <arin-ppml at arin.net>
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2019-19: Require IPv6 Before
Receiving Section 8 IPv4 Transfers
On 6 Nov 2019, at 3:23 PM, Michel Py <michel at arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us> wrote:
> There is no law that says I need IPv6, therefore the courts will hear my case for undue burden.
As ARIN is not a governmental authority (but rather administering the registry on behalf of the community via a set of contracts), you?ll probably need to look instead to contract law doctrine (e.g. unconscionability) for possible grounds for a cause of action. Given that ARIN is only enforcing community policy and your ability to make productive use of any address space is predicated upon cooperation with the same community, you might find it difficult to argue that you wish the benefits of cooperation minus whatever obligations that community collectively establishes.
President and CEO
American Registry for Internet Numbers
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
More information about the ARIN-PPML