[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2019-19: Require IPv6 Before Receiving Section 8 IPv4 Transfers
fhfrediani at gmail.com
Tue Nov 12 08:22:46 EST 2019
On 12/11/2019 01:38, Michel Py wrote:
> The enterprise market will not adopt IPv6. If it takes splitting ARIN in two, so be it.
> Frankly at this time I would welcome it. IPv6 is only trouble for me, and I do not think ARIN is representing my interests.
You have a few options here:
1) Accept that you are a minority within ARIN and ARIN will hardly
represent the interest of these minority willing to navigate in the
opposite direction and to a dead end.
2) Move your business to another RIR that may not be working as much to
promote IPv6 transition and convince the other entire community to go
that opposite direction.
3) Create another RIR - ICP-2 is your friend if you have enough people
that share your ideas and you fulfill those requirements (the documents
says: "very substantial majority of the ISPs in the region")
4) Go to another type of business.
> It has been 20 years, and I still am in the 90% of enterprise customers who are not going to do anything about IPv6 for the next 10 years.
> Tone it down.
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
More information about the ARIN-PPML