[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2019-19: Require IPv6 Before Receiving Section 8 IPv4 Transfers

Scott Leibrand scottleibrand at gmail.com
Mon Nov 11 20:16:40 EST 2019


Agreed. If you want a meaningful use requirement, legislate a meaningful use requirement. Tie it to free money, as with EHRs and FHIR, or figure out some legislative authority to mandate it. ARIN isn’t a legislative authority: they’re a registry, whose job it is to keep track of who’s using what numbers. 

Scott

> On Nov 11, 2019, at 4:56 PM, Alan Batie <alan at batie.org> wrote:
> 
> On 11/11/19 4:51 PM, hostmaster at uneedus.com wrote:
>> Then I guess we need to make the IPv6 connectivity an ongoing obligation
>> to keep the additional IPv4 blocks, rather than a one shot test during
>> transfer to eliminate the game playing.
> 
> Even I'm not ready to go that far yet, although I can sympathize...
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ARIN-PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.


More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list