[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2019-19: Require IPv6 Before Receiving Section 8 IPv4 Transfers

[Fernando Frediani]

As a registry it has full rights to establish the policies the community 
find to work better for the region in a well defined and established 
process. Among its rights are to define the requirements for something 
related to registration to happen as for example transfers.

Regards
Fernando

On 11/11/2019 22:16, Scott Leibrand wrote:
> Agreed. If you want a meaningful use requirement, legislate a meaningful use requirement. Tie it to free money, as with EHRs and FHIR, or figure out some legislative authority to mandate it. ARIN isn’t a legislative authority: they’re a registry, whose job it is to keep track of who’s using what numbers.
>
> Scott
>
>> On Nov 11, 2019, at 4:56 PM, Alan Batie <alan at batie.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 11/11/19 4:51 PM, hostmaster at uneedus.com wrote:
>>> Then I guess we need to make the IPv6 connectivity an ongoing obligation
>>> to keep the additional IPv4 blocks, rather than a one shot test during
>>> transfer to eliminate the game playing.
>> Even I'm not ready to go that far yet, although I can sympathize...
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ARIN-PPML
>> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
>> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
>> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
>> https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
>> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
> _______________________________________________
> ARIN-PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.