[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2019-19: Require IPv6 Before Receiving Section 8 IPv4 Transfers

[hostmaster at uneedus.com]

No problem. However under this policy draft, you would no longer receive 
any additional IPv4 addresses from ARIN.  Further, getting a court order 
to split the registry apart is even a greater stretch.

I have legacy stuff.  However I have also had IPv6 since 2007. It was 
initially done as a federal requirement, have it or no federal business. 
This proposal is much of the same.

Albert Erdmann
Network Administrator
Paradise On Line Inc.

On Wed, 6 Nov 2019, Michel Py wrote:

>> scott at solarnetone.org
>> What do you normally do when hardware or software hits EOL?
>
> I keep it until I serves no purpose.
>
> I repeat : ARIN will not force me to waste time filling IPv6 paperwork without consequences.
>
> If ARIN wants to go IPv6-only, there will be a nice case in court to split the IPv4 part to another registry.
> There is no law that says I need IPv6, therefore the courts will hear my case for undue burden.
>
> Michel.
>
> _______________________________________________
> ARIN-PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>