[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2019-19: Require IPv6 Before Receiving Section 8 IPv4 Transfers

[scott]

On Wed, 6 Nov 2019, Michel Py wrote:

> I oppose this proposal. If I am ever in a position where ARIN is trying 
> to force me to request or use IPv6, I will sue ARIN for imposing an 
> undue burden.

What do you normally do when hardware or software hits EOL?

>
> I am serious. If ARIN generates more work for me, I will explore all 
> options to be compensated.

Look, you are free to run Windows 3.1 on your 10BASE2 network, if that 
makes less work for you, and less work is a variable you optimize for in 
your networks.  This is, however, 2019.  IPv6 has been around for a while. 
IPv4 has been officially depleted for years now.  IPv4 being considered 
the "legacy Internet" is not that many years away.  Is it more work to get 
ahead of the curve, or play catch up?



>
> Michel.
>
> _______________________________________________
> ARIN-PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>