[arin-ppml] prop266 - re-framing the discussion

Carlos Friaças cfriacas at fccn.pt
Sat May 4 19:00:05 EDT 2019


I can change my mind, especially when people are being constructive.

And when i understand people are being manipulative and diverting 
to "ad hominem" instead of being constructive, i can change my mind again 
and focus on other priorities.

So at this point i'm interested in learning people's opinion (beyond 
Mr.Py's) if squatting should or should not be part of _this_ proposal.


ps: ...and i'm nowehere near to be a politician. :-)

On Sat, 4 May 2019, Michel Py wrote:

> Hi Carlos,
>>>> Michel Py wrote :
>>>> ARIN should not create a double standard that penalizes hijacking and tolerates squatting.
>> Carlos Friaças wrote :
>> I said i don't see an issue, if other people see an issue then we need to address it.
>> So... agreed! Will work on that on a further version.
> You need to provide more than lip service here. 24 hours ago you had no problem with squatting, it is going to take some serious work to convince that you are not yet another turncoat, a somehow derogatory but popular term associated with politicians who turn in the wind each time it fluctuates.
> I'm sorry to say it, but it appears to me that you had never heard of squatting 2 days ago. Your own words, again.
> I question your expertise in the matter. If squatting is new to you, why should ARIN even consider your petition ?
> Why should ARIN even look into it, as you have posted publicly that you did not know about the problem ?
> You have a serious credibility problem.
> Michel.

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list