[arin-ppml] [EXT] Re: Open Petition for ARIN-prop-266: BGP Hijacking is an ARIN Policy Violation

Ronald F. Guilmette rfg at tristatelogic.com
Fri May 3 16:16:29 EDT 2019

In message <CAN-Dau1CyVuayPQGibmsX6F9AvHrk7YWTy=O_BZYDduwg3kfuQ at mail.gmail.com>
David Farmer <farmer at umn.edu> wrote:

>> The latter can generally be distinguished from the former via the passage
>> of time.  If an operator has been duly notified that he/she/it is
>> announcing
>> a route that he/she/it shouldn't be, and if there is no change after the
>> passage of a number of days, then and only then does there even begin to
>> be some basis for further investigation to determine if the announcement is
>> deliberate and not just a "fat fingers" error.
>Maybe it can be distinguished, but how much time has to laps with you
>ignoring ARIN before ARIN takes away your resources? An hour, a day, a
>week, a month, 90 days?

I will defer to the proposal authors for an answer to this question.

>Furthermore, the proposal is much more a process than it is a policy.

I will also defer to the propsal authors to address this seemingly
legitimate criticism.


More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list