[arin-ppml] prop266 - re-framing the discussion

Ronald F. Guilmette rfg at tristatelogic.com
Fri May 3 01:37:11 EDT 2019

In message <CAP-guGXAGSQxdU1ZRuChVH4C1Am5j4BKwfgWyG8E437k96HttA at mail.gmail.com>
William Herrin <bill at herrin.us> wrote:

>Where they
>exist at all (they don't for legacy registrations), the contracts don't
>well support ARIN taking adverse action against a registrant for their
>behavior with respect to Internet routing.

So there is no mechanism or provision for amending / superceeding / updating
the existing contracts?

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list