[arin-ppml] [EXT] Re: Open Petition for ARIN-prop-266: BGP Hijacking is an ARIN Policy Violation

Marilson Mapa marilson.mapa at gmail.com
Thu May 2 22:07:36 EDT 2019

The president of ARIN describes his institution as an RIR with appropriate
and functional policies. This is what we can deduce from his speech
whenever he describes the performance of his institution. This same
attitude can be seen in RIPE.

"Violation can have consequence".

It seems that the expression "can have" should be understood as "almost
never", after all how to explain the rot that permeates the global
Internet? The complaints, the lawsuits, the fines are becoming more and
more frequent.
I have today received as a member of BPF Cybersecurity the document ***UN
1st Committee Processes on Responsible State Behaviour in Cyberspace
explainer**. *This 25-page document, addressed to ICANN, reports what they
call disastrous behavior. It was drafted by Rubin International Law Firm
and Notary of Israel for a Jewish religious institution.

Basically they are demanding:
"We require ICANN to terminate immediately the activities fostering
Internet addiction, including the performance of relevant IANA functions,
relevant gTLD activities, relevant Registry Operators' activities, relevant
ICANN-accredited registrars' activities, including through RESP and
amendments of registry and registrar agreements and to refrain from
renewing the .info registry agreement with Afilias unless Afilias and its
related companies terminate immediately activities fostering Internet
addiction and the .info registry agreement is amended to prohibit Internet
addiction activities."

It's just one of the thousands of complaints popping up around the globe.
And ARIN does not move a finger... It's out of the scope...


Em qui, 2 de mai de 2019 às 17:01, John Curran <jcurran at arin.net> escreveu:

> > On May 2, 2019, at 2:12 PM, Carlos Friaças via ARIN-PPML <
> arin-ppml at arin.net> wrote:
> > ...
> > It seems evident that a RIR can't revoke legacy space. Ever.
> Carlos -
> In the case of ARIN that would be incorrect, as ARIN has revoked legacy
> address space from parties that have violated registry policies.
> ARIN registry policies are applicable to all parties in the registry -
> those legacy holders under RSA do have specific terms and conditions (and a
> reduced fee schedule), but ARIN registry policies are applicable regardless
> and violation can have consequence.
> Thanks!
> /John
> John Curran
> President and CEO
> American Registry for Internet Numbers
> _______________________________________________
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20190502/225b6963/attachment-0002.html>

More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list